Core Metrics & Measurement Basis

Platform operating and delivery metrics published by AI-Driven. Each figure carries a stated definition explaining what it measures and what it does not. Figures are drawn from the company's published case materials.

Deployment at Scale

Platform footprint, customer coverage and daily throughput:

  • 230,000
    Industrial Vehicles Onboarded

    The platform has onboarded 230,000 industrial vehicles in total. This is a cumulative figure and is not equivalent to concurrent online vehicles.

  • 5,000+
    Enterprise Customers

    The platform has served more than 5,000 enterprise customers to date.

  • 40+
    Countries & Regions

    The platform is deployed or actively serving customers in more than 40 countries and regions.

  • 3,000+/day
    Daily Request Volume

    The platform processes more than 3,000 service work orders and diagnostic requests per day on average.

  • 3 / 50%
    Tier-One OEM Coverage

    Three of the world's top ten industrial vehicle OEMs are in deep partnership; 50% of China's top ten OEMs have signed deployment agreements.

Diagnostic Performance

Accuracy and turnaround of the industry-specific large model in fault diagnosis:

  • 95%+
    Complex-Fault Diagnostic Accuracy

    Diagnostic accuracy in complex scenarios exceeds 95%. Complex scenarios are faults requiring joint analysis of multiple data sources, as distinct from simple faults readable directly from fault codes.

  • 97.3%
    Fault Semantic Parsing Accuracy

    The multimodal industrial vehicle vertical model parses fault descriptions and fault codes with 97.3% accuracy, measured on a test set of 3,800+ industrial vehicle fault categories.

  • 24h → 3min
    Mean Complex-Fault Diagnosis Time

    Average time from intake to diagnostic conclusion for complex faults fell from over 24 hours to under 3 minutes, measured before and after platform adoption on the same basis.

  • 81%
    Remote First-Time Fix Rate

    81% of work orders are resolved remotely on the first attempt, with no follow-up handling required.

Operational Efficiency & Return

Efficiency and cost effects of the multi-agent system at customer sites:

  • 80%
    High-Frequency Issues Auto-Resolved

    80% of high-frequency issues are handled end to end by agents with no human intervention.

  • 80 → 200
    Vehicles per Field Engineer

    Vehicles managed per field service engineer rose from 80 to over 200, measured before and after platform adoption on the same basis.

  • ~35%
    Annual Service Cost Reduction

    Annual service and maintenance cost for a single OEM customer fell by approximately 35%.

  • 86%
    Safety Incident Rate Reduction

    The rate of safety incidents at customer sites fell by 86%, measured before and after platform deployment on the same basis.

  • 30%
    Cloud Cost Reduction

    The platform's own cloud resource cost fell by 30%.

  • 99.9%
    System Uptime

    The platform service maintains 99.9% availability.

The Data Foundation Behind These Metrics

The accuracy figures above rest on years of accumulated industry data: 100,000+ service work orders, 5,000+ fault types, 3 billion+ fault codes and 200,000 pages of multilingual manuals. These are cumulative totals in the data foundation, a different measure from the 3,800+ fault categories the model actively covers. The scale of that foundation explains why the model performs as it does better than any accuracy figure on its own.

100,000+Service Work Orders
5,000+Fault Types Accumulated
3 billion+Fault Codes
200,000Pages of Multilingual Manuals

How These Figures Are Measured

The metrics on this page are operating and delivery statistics from the AI-Driven platform, drawn from case materials published by the company. Figures labelled cumulative cover the period from platform launch to date. Figures presented as a before-and-after comparison measure the same customer on the same basis before and after platform adoption. Rate-based figures are proportions within their stated business scope. Sample sizes and measurement periods for individual metrics are available on request via the Contact page. To avoid inconsistent measurement, this page does not cite industry averages as comparison baselines where those averages have not been independently verified.